![guitar center softube tape guitar center softube tape](https://filecr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/softube-tape-free-download-01.jpg)
Guitar center softube tape full#
If it turns out to be all smoke and mirrors I'll just send it back within the 2-week return period for a full refund (minus like $45 in shipping I suppose). Pretty much a powerful stand-alone computer dedicated purely to guitar signal processing.Ĭourse this is all on paper and forum threads, I've yet to use it myself, I ordered it and hopefully it will arrive within the week.
Guitar center softube tape software#
It's definitely a software amp-modeler in a 2U case however it also has a military grade TigerSharc dual-core processor with a boatload of onboard internal memory. There are a growing number of people with legit backgrounds who are using this thing. There's definitely a lot of hype surrounding this thing, however some of the demos and youtube examples I've heard have convinced me to try this thing out. I'm not saying that I've heard one that sounds as good as the real thing, but I've heard pretty close. I've been open to trying modelers and at the start, their digital quality was quite apparent, but over the last couple years I really think modelers have been hitting their stride. I'm not trying to boast because there is certainly better gear out there, but I am quite familiar with good tube tone at massive, face-melting volumes. I've owned and extensively used some serious tube amps: Zinky Superfly, Two-Rock Overdrive, Matchless Chieftain, and a huge variety of Mesa's of all shapes, sizes, years, and makes. I work at Guitar Center which I'm sure raises certain perceptions, but the bottom line is that I have access and am forced to listen to a huge variety of amps on a daily basis. But just curious, have you actually used the Axe-Fx on an extensive level? I totally am down for the power of subjective opinion especially in terms of tone. Yeah, if you can't tell I think it's possible (likely even) that it's a nice modeler but I don' think it's worth $1500 to $2000. But in reality - it has A/D converters, some processing power, a UI, some algos, and then it hits a D/A - not in anyway different or revolutionary in concept or construction from any other software modeler out there.īut being guitar players it seems we are hardwired into thinking More Expensive = Better. I think the developer has done a great job in marketing it as some sort of device produced in solitary suffering by a savant engineer, loving crafted from the finest materials, bathed in unicorn tears etc. Think about it: what is it and what does it do? Quite simply it's a software amp modeler packaged in a 2U Rack case. the tone from a preset will be shaded differently. If a person tries any of the Guitar Plugins mentioned, with different monitor set-ups in different rooms. There is still a hardware and environment component to all this. Yup, they aren't the same as a physical amplifier, but my give-a-crap-o-meter is registering zero. I have at my fingertips a great way to create, shade and effect a huge palette of tones. I think that it is important to allow an AU plug-in to thrive in its place on the channel strip in conjunction with track and routing options. From there, it simply becomes a case of me saying to myself, "shaddap and play". I am a big fan of assessing a tool or its tech on its' own merits, then optimizing and enhancing it. Yes, it seems to be an interesting combination of actual "evolution" and "change for change's sake". Maybe that's sacrilegious but tools change with times. They were simply the building blocks available in the 60s when electric guitar amplification was in it's infancy. but I try to keep in mind that there is nothing 'magical' about vacuum tubes and capacitors and transformers. Amps will always have their fans and their uses but for the majority modeling will take over. The inevitable result is a foregone conclusion, imo.
![guitar center softube tape guitar center softube tape](https://media.guitarcenter.com/is/image/MMGS7/Console-1-MK2-Digital-Mixer/000000117307162-00-220x220.jpg)
To me this debate is astonishingly similar to the "tape vs. In the context of a song, the modeled amps and FX are not going to be the weak link or even suspect. I'm a home hobbyist though so it's not like I'm taking a bold stand or anything. Put me in the camp of being 'done' with micing physical amps. For cleaner sounds I really like Logic's Amp Designer. Close enough that it's not worth the hassle of setting them up. If I wish to I can get ridiculously close to the sound of my mic'ed amps. I'm getting excellent results for semi-dirty to heavily over-driven sounds with Guitar Rig 4. Really, I've gotten beyond tired of A/Bing and trying new sims or speakers or mics or what have you. And I own and have extensive experience with the AxeTrack and Grendel Deadroom II speaker isolation cabinets, Palmer PDI-03 (along with a small assortment of amps). But I've tried so many software modelers.